Plaintiffs Entitled to Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to 42 USC 1988—Criteria Explained
The Fourth Department reversed Supreme Court and found that plaintiffs were entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 USC 1988.
Plaintiffs had brought an Article 78/declaratory judgment proceeding alleging that they had been improperly removed by the city from an approved list of certified lead inspectors. The plaintiffs prevailed and were returned to the list. Although the Article 78/declaratory judgment determination was made on state grounds, a federal “denial of due process” claim had also been made. The Fourth Department explained the criteria for the award of attorney’s fees in this context:
The governing statute, 42 USC § 1988 (b), provides that, “[i]n any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title . . . the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party . . . a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs . . .” “Although some courts have held, as did the court in this case, that the decision whether to grant an award is entirely discretionary . . . this is incorrect . . . [T]he prevailing party ordinarily should recover reasonable fees unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust’ ” … . Where, as here, “relief is sought on both State and Federal grounds, but nevertheless awarded on State grounds only,” attorney’s fees may be awarded if a constitutional question is involved and such question is “substantial and arises out of a common nucleus of operative facts as the State claim” … . “The threshold for establishing substantiality of a Federal claim is minimal: the claim must not be wholly insubstantial,’ obviously frivolous’ or obviously without merit’ “… . Cerberus Props LLC v Kirkmire, 2014 NY Slip Op 06723, 4th Dept 10-3-14