Statement Protected by “Common Interest Privilege,” Tortious Interference Action Can Only Be Brought Against a Stranger to the Contract
The First Department affirmed the dismissal of a complaint alleging defamation and tortious interference with contract. The court explained that the statement made by a management employee was protected by the common interest privilege and only a stranger to a contract can bring a tortious interference claim:
Defendant…’s statement that plaintiff was “deliberately sabotaging” defendant[‘s] IT redesign project was protected by the common-interest privilege because it constituted a communication “made to persons who have some common interest in the subject matter” …, namely, the people working on the IT system redesign. The statement is also protected as one made by a “management employee[] having responsibility to report on the matter in dispute” … . Plaintiff’s allegations of malice, in an effort to overcome the common-interest privilege, amount to little more than “mere surmise and conjecture” … .
Plaintiff’s tortious interference claims … were also properly dismissed. “It is well established that only a stranger to a contract, such as a third party, can be liable for tortious interference with a contract” … . Ashby v ALM Media LLC, 2013 NY Slip Op 06497, 1st Dept 10-8-13
