PLAINTIFF SOUGHT ONLY CANCELLATION OF A MORTGAGE; THE JUDGE SHOULD NOT HAVE, SUA SPONTE, CANCELLED THE NOTE AS WELL (SECOND DEPT).
The Second Department, reversing Supreme Court, determined the judge should not have, sua sponte, granted relief that was not asked for by the plaintiff. Plaintiff sought cancellation and discharge of a mortgage pursuant to Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (RPAPL) 1501(4). The judge cancelled the mortgage and the note: “The court may grant relief […]
