You are here: / / CONDITIONS OF FATHER’S VISITATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED BY A THER...

CONDITIONS OF FATHER’S VISITATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED BY A THERAPIST.

The Second Department determined Family Court improperly left the conditions for father’s visitation with his child up to a therapist:

… [I]t is for the Family Court—not the child’s therapist—to exercise its own discretion to determine how, when, and under what terms and conditions the father’s visitation with the subject child … is to resume … . Matter of Rogan v Guida, 2016 NY Slip Op 06716, 2nd Dept 10-12-16

FAMILY LAW (CONDITIONS OF FATHER’S VISITATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED BY A THERAPIST)/VISITATION (FAMILY LAW, CONDITIONS OF FATHER’S VISITATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED BY A THERAPIST)

You might also like
A MUNICIPALITY HAS A DUTY TO INSPECT TREES ADJACENT TO ROADWAYS EVEN IF THE TREES ARE NOT ON THE MUNICIPALITY’S LAND; HERE THE MUNICIPALITY DID NOT DEMONSTRATE IT DID NOT HAVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF THE CONDITION OF THE TREE WHICH FELL ON PLAINTIFFS CAR (SECOND DEPT).
PLAINTIFF’S LEANING TO THE SIDE OF A NON-DEFECTIVE LADDER WAS THE SOLE PROXIMATE CAUSE OF INJURY.
Defendants Demonstrated They Were Entitled to Depose Nonparty Physician Whose Notations Expressed Skepticism About the Cause of Plaintiff’s Injuries
FAILURE TO INCLUDE YEAR IN THE DATES OF THE SIGNATURES REQUIRED INVALIDATION OF THE DESIGNATING PETITION.
ATTORNEY ENTITLED TO FEES PURSUANT TO QUANTUM MERUIT DESPITE FAILURE TO FILE A RETAINER STATEMENT AND THE ABSENCE OF A FEE SHARING AGREEMENT (SECOND DEPT).
Late Notice of Claim Can Be Allowed Even in Absence of Reasonable Excuse Where Defendants Had Actual Notice
Defense Counsel’s Denial of Defendant’s Assertion He Was Forced to Plead Guilty Required Assignment of New Counsel
MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE VERDICT IN THIS PERSONAL INJURY CASE PROPERLY GRANTED, THE JURY FOUND DEFENDANT NEGLIGENT BUT WENT ON TO FIND THE NEGLIGENCE WAS NOT THE PROXIMATE CAUSE OF THE INJURY.

Categories

Sign Up for the Mailing List to Be Notified When the Site Is Updated.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Copyright © 2026 New York Appellate Digest, Inc.
Site by CurlyHost | Privacy Policy

DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO A HEARING RE: WHETHER HIS CONVICTION SHOULD BE VACATED;... INSURER WAS NOTIFIED OF PLAINTIFFS’ LAWSUIT BY THE INJURED PLAINTIFFS...