Factual Sufficiency of Indictment Is Non-Jurisdictional Defect
The Third Department noted that the factual sufficiency of an indictment is a non-jurisdictional defect which does not survive a guilty plea. People v Cruz, 104251, 3rd Dept. 3-21-13
This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Bruce Freeman contributed 11668 entries already.
The Third Department noted that the factual sufficiency of an indictment is a non-jurisdictional defect which does not survive a guilty plea. People v Cruz, 104251, 3rd Dept. 3-21-13
In a lengthy opinion by Judge Read, the Court of Appeals determined that, where a purchase contract for real property has been breached, the measure of damages is the difference between the sale price and the market value of the property at the time of the breach. The price at which the property subsequently sells […]
The First Department held that a wife’s derivative claim in a medical malpractice action brought by her husband could be added to the complaint after the statute of limitations had expired (disagreeing with the 2nd and 3rd Departments): The motion court properly exercised its discretion in granting leave to amend. The original complaint placed Kings […]
In finding the plaintiff had raised a question of fact about whether the municipality affirmatively created a dangerous condition (a curved section of fence alongside a roadway), the Second Department wrote: Where, as here, a municipality has enacted a prior written notice statute, it may not be subject to liability for personal injuries caused by […]
The Second Department reversed the grant of summary judgment to the defendant village because the village did not rule out the possibility that the sidewalk defect had been affirmatively created by negligent design and construction, an exception to the requirement that the village have prior notice of a sidewalk defect before a personal injury suit […]
In reversing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants in an action for false arrest, malicious prosecution and violation of 42 USC 1983, the Second Department wrote: …[I]n opposition to the Allstate defendants’ prima facie showing, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact as to whether the Allstate defendants affirmatively induced law […]
In affirming the motion court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant prime contractor and defendant subcontractors, the Second Department clearly described the relevant proof requirements for Labor Law 200, 240 (1), 241 (6) and common-law negligence causes of action. Giovanniello v E W Howell, Co., LLC, 2013 NY Slip Op 01805, 2011-11465, Ind No 26676/09, […]
The Second Department determined the conviction for “criminal sexual act in the first degree” was against the weight of the evidence because the relevant testimony, although credible, did not prove all the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt: The defendant correctly contends that his conviction of criminal sexual act in the first degree […]
In reversing the conviction, the Second Department determined that the acquittal on a rape count rendered the conviction on a related “endangering the welfare of a child” count “against the weight of the evidence.” The Second Department also ruled that questions posed by defense counsel did not “open the door” to questioning by the prosecutor […]
In reversing the conviction, the Second Department determined two juror challenges for cause should have been granted because the jurors indicated they would tend to give added weight to the testimony of police officers and the court did not seek unequivocal assurances the jurors could set aside their bias. Defendant’s co-defendant’s judgment of conviction was […]

Copyright © 2026 New York Appellate Digest, Inc.
Site by CurlyHost | Privacy Policy