Pulling Defendant from Inside His Home for Warrantless Arrest Violated the Fourth Amendment
The Second Department determined that a new trial was required because defendant’s statement should have been suppressed. The police pulled the defendant from inside his home to arrest him without a warrant, a violation of the Fourth Amendment. The Second Department noted, however, that the trial court did not err in refusing the suppress evidence of a post-arrest lineup identification:
Here, the police knocked on the defendant’s door at approximately 6:50 a.m. When the defendant answered the door he appeared to be “half asleep,” and was naked from the waist down. He only partially opened the door, was never in full view of the police, and never crossed the threshold of his apartment. When the police directed the defendant to step fully into view, the defendant instead attempted to shut the door, trapping a detective’s arm as the detective tried to keep the door from closing. After law enforcement officials successfully pushed the door open, they pulled the defendant from the area behind the door into the public hallway, where he was then arrested.
Under the discrete circumstances of this case, where the police officers crossed the threshold into the defendant’s apartment, pulled him into the hallway, and arrested him without a warrant, the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated … . People v Riffas, 2014 NY Slip Op 06333, 2nd Dept 9-24-14