Police Officer’s Convictions for “Criminal Diversion” (Obtaining Another’s Prescription Medication), and “Official Misconduct” Not Supported by Legally Sufficient Evidence

CurlyHost — Fri, 08 May 2015 04:00:00 +0000

The Third Department reversed defendant’s convictions for criminal diversion and official misconduct because the offenses were not supported by legally sufficient evidence. The defendant, a police officer, was accused of obtaining someone’s prescription drugs in exchange for something of pecuniary value (criminal diversion). She was also accused of flashing her badge to a pharmacist and asking the pharmacist to hurry up with a prescription drug (official misconduct). The Third Department determined the “criminal diversion” charge was not supported by evidence the drug involved (a muscle relaxant) was a “prescription medication.” And, in the absence of evidence the defendant knew that flashing her badge constituted an unauthorized exercise of her official functions, there was not sufficient evidence to support the “official misconduct” charge. People v Barnes, 2014 NY Slip Op 03310, 3rd Dept 5-8-14

CRIMINAL DIVERSION – New York Appellate Digest

Police Officer’s Convictions for “Criminal Diversion” (Obtaining Another’s Prescription Medication), and “Official Misconduct” Not Supported by Legally Sufficient Evidence