New York Appellate Cases in Digest.

Your source for the issues, decisions, and case summaries from all four New York Appellate Divisions and the Court of Appeals. Easily search by topics, dates, and keywords. Create a memorandum of law in seconds.

Actual Intelligence at your fingertips.

Our platform makes it easy to stay informed on the most recent case decisions, search through summaries from the four New York Appellate Divisions and the Court of Appeals, and one more benefit of this site.

BENEFIT 1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Search by Category

BENEFIT 2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Search by Date

BENEFIT 3

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Search by Keyword

Dominate your Topic at Record Speeds

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Duis scelerisque rutrum libero vitae porta. Cras tempus vel arcu ut suscipit. Integer molestie ut urna eget suscipit.

ON DEMAND MEMOS

Optimize your time with On-Demand Issue Memos.

Latest Decisions.

Recent cases from the four New York Appellate Divisions and the Court of Appeals.

, ,

ALTHOUGH THIS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ACTION WAS IMPROPERLY BROUGHT AS AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND PETITION, IT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DISMISSED; RATHER IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN CONVERTED BY DEEMING THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE A SUMMONS AND THE PETITION A COMPLAINT; MATTER REMITTED (SECOND DEPT).

The Second Department, reversing Supreme Court, determined that the action should not have been dismissed because it was in the form of a proceeding rather than an action. Supreme Court should have converted the proceeding into the proper form: The…
, ,

THE REGULATIONS WHICH PLACE A CAP ON THE NUMBER OF SERIOUSLY MENTALLY ILL PERSONS WHO CAN BE ADMITTED TO A LONG-TERM CARE FACILITY DO NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (CT APP). ​

The Court of Appeals, in a full-fledged opinion by Judge Halligan, determined the regulations putting a cap on the number of seriously mentally ill persons who can be accepted by a long-term care facility did not facially discriminate against…
,

HERE AN ALLEGED PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENT BY THE ROBBERY VICTIM, OFFERED AT TRIAL SOLELY FOR IMPEACHMENT, DID NOT RENDER THE EVIDENCE LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT; THE VICTIM WAS THE SOLE WITNESS TO TESTIFY ABOUT THE FACTS (CT APP). ​

The Court of Appeals, affirming defendant's conviction. over a three-judge concurring opinion, determined that an alleged prior inconsistent statement made by the robbery victim, the only fact witness, offered at trial solely for impeachment,…

New York Appellate Cases by Category

Categories

About New York Appellate Digest

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, dolor ligula euismod eget leo. Velit vestibulum eros, volutpat in placerat ultricies lobortis ac, rutrum arcu sodales lectus, nisl et convallis exercitationem, libero imperdiet et. Nunc sit. Mattis ante blandit in sapien sit, ante pellentesque, nulla aliquam sodales, lorem tempus nec risus proin vel commodo. Eget fermentum erat tellus. In sapien assumenda nibh donec, massa tempus interdum nec, quam risus nulla nulla ornare dolor pharetra. Lorem nisl vel luctus, vestibulum fusce sit ante pede, dolor quam est ullamcorper orci, dolor dictumst consectetuer eu sollicitudin duis ut. Euismod vestibulum auctor, ut tempor lectus nunc suspendisse nec, quis phasellus massa blandit tristique nibh. Sociis interdum ultrices maecenas pellentesque lorem pede, phasellus semper nulla nec felis et potenti, augue accumsan vestibulum quis. At non ut sem posuere placerat.