Comments on: THERE IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE PERSONAL-SERVICE-OF-A-CLAIM REQUIREMENT IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS ACT FOR ACTIONS SEEKING DAMAGES FOR THE STATE’S APPROPRIATION OF PROPERTY; HERE SERVICE BY REGULAR FIRST-CLASS MAIL WAS NOT A JURIDICTIONAL DEFECT (SECOND DEPT).

Comments on: THERE IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE PERSONAL-SERVICE-OF-A-CLAIM REQUIREMENT IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS ACT FOR ACTIONS SEEKING DAMAGES FOR THE STATE’S APPROPRIATION OF PROPERTY; HERE SERVICE BY REGULAR FIRST-CLASS MAIL WAS NOT A JURIDICTIONAL DEFECT (SECOND DEPT). https://www.newyorkappellatedigest.com/2026/06/24/there-is-an-exception-to-the-personal-service-of-a-claim-requirement-in-the-court-of-claims-act-for-actions-seeking-damages-for-the-states-appropriation-of-property-here-service-by-regular-first-cl/ Sun, 05 Jul 2026 14:00:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0