Comments on: ALTHOUGH DEFENDANT IN THIS REAR-END COLLISION CASE DID NOT PLEAD THE EMERGENCY DOCTRINE AS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, THE DEFENSE WAS PROPERLY RAISED IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION (FIRST DEPT).

Comments on: ALTHOUGH DEFENDANT IN THIS REAR-END COLLISION CASE DID NOT PLEAD THE EMERGENCY DOCTRINE AS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, THE DEFENSE WAS PROPERLY RAISED IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION (FIRST DEPT). https://www.newyorkappellatedigest.com/2026/05/12/although-defendant-in-this-rear-end-collision-case-did-not-plead-the-emergency-doctrine-as-an-affirmative-defense-the-defense-was-properly-raised-in-opposition-to-plaintiffs-summary-judgment-motion/ Sat, 16 May 2026 15:41:15 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0