Comments on: DEFENDANT WAS NOT ENTITLED TO VACATION OF HIS CONVICTIONS ON THE GROUND THE COUNTS WHICH WERE DISMISSED AT TRIAL HAD A PREJUDICIAL “SPILL-OVER-EFFECT” ON THE REMAINING COUNTS (SECOND DEPT).

Comments on: DEFENDANT WAS NOT ENTITLED TO VACATION OF HIS CONVICTIONS ON THE GROUND THE COUNTS WHICH WERE DISMISSED AT TRIAL HAD A PREJUDICIAL “SPILL-OVER-EFFECT” ON THE REMAINING COUNTS (SECOND DEPT). https://www.newyorkappellatedigest.com/2026/05/06/defendant-was-not-entitled-to-vacation-of-his-convictions-on-the-ground-the-counts-which-were-dismissed-at-trial-had-a-prejudicial-spill-over-effect-on-the-remaining-counts-second-dept/ Sat, 09 May 2026 16:11:27 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4