Comments on: THE JURY’S CONCLUSION THAT THE BURGLARY VICTIM SUFFERED “PHYSICAL INJURY” WAS AGAINST THE WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE; THE ONLY EVIDENCE WAS THE VICTIM’S TESTIMONY HE SUFFERED PAIN AT 6 ON A SCALE OF 1 TO 10 (SECOND DEPT).

Comments on: THE JURY’S CONCLUSION THAT THE BURGLARY VICTIM SUFFERED “PHYSICAL INJURY” WAS AGAINST THE WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE; THE ONLY EVIDENCE WAS THE VICTIM’S TESTIMONY HE SUFFERED PAIN AT 6 ON A SCALE OF 1 TO 10 (SECOND DEPT). https://www.newyorkappellatedigest.com/2026/03/18/the-jurys-conclusion-that-the-burglary-victim-suffered-physical-injury-was-against-the-weight-of-the-evidence-the-only-evidence-was-the-victims-testimony-he-suffered-pain-at-6-on-a-scale-of-1/ Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:19:56 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4